Wednesday, August 02, 2006

911 Commission Distrusted the Pentagon Story

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A member of the 9/11 commission said Wednesday that panel members so distrusted testimony from Pentagon officials that they referred their concerns to the Pentagon's inspector general.
The panel even considered taking the matter to the Justice Department for a possible criminal probe, commission member Tim Roemer said.
"We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting," Roemer told CNN. "We were not sure of the intent, whether it was to deceive the commission or merely part of the fumbling bureaucracy."
The issues concerned Pentagon officials' testimony about the timeline of events on September 11, 2001, when terrorists hijacked four U.S. airliners and crashed them into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania.

MORE

11 comments:

  1. I stopped over at your friends blog (Bu$hmerika) is ole chukie bouy ok? seems to me that this guy is on the verge of having a mental breakdown, would not suprise me if we did not wake up one morning and find out they had to strap ole' chuckie boy down to a gurney and haul his ass of to the mental ward.

    I have never in my life seen someone so obssesed with George Bush and this guy has this little caption over his pic saying no sheep here...ha....he is part of a real big flock called the Left Wing hacks...you go chuckie.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope this audio link works: Randi Rhodes on NORAD's lack of response (from August 2, 2006). All the commercials have been edited out. It is actually edge-of-your-seat stuff, listening to Randi piece it all together and say it was an inside job -- without actually saying it word for word. The FAA and/or NORAD tapes she plays only add fuel to the fire.

    Paul Thompson, the creator of the 9/11 Timeline web site, is a guest for 17 minutes of this hour-and-ten-minute segment.

    Enjoy. It is well worth your time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous11:01 AM

    Hey what Da fuck another conspiracy theory, how many does this make 5, 6, 7 or 8, I would think anyone with any common sense and the technology we have today that can manipulate audio and video to suit or needs would be some apprehenssive about some of this carap, I suppose when they first tried to bring down the WTC in 93 there was no conspiracy because of a Democrat being in office. Just another whack job trying to make a name for theirselves.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous ...Another conspiracy theory, how many does this make 5, 6, 7 or 8...?

    You're just learning about this for the first time? Where in the world have you been?

    Anonymous: I suppose when they first tried to bring down the WTC in 93 there was no conspiracy because of a Democrat being in office.

    Aside from not making much sense (what do political parties have to do with any of it?), you seem to be implying that there WAS a conspiracy at the WTC in 1993 and that those of us who may not believe it are just partisans. If you are just being facetious, then you are not very good at it. If there is a theory with incredibly solid evidence to back an "insider conspiracy" in 1993, please present it. In fact, I'll help you get started. This little clip is one minute and eleven seconds long: FBI facilitated the 1993 attacks? You don't have to believe it. Just think of it as a starting point to do further research.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous5:13 PM

    What Da fuck now we have nine theories...dumb ass wake up and smell the coffee, this whole thing is a conspricay, and the conspricay is to get George Bush, good luck on your fucking witch hunt, for him being a dumb ass Texan like everyone wants to make him to be, I guess the man has out smarted all of you NO TALENT ASS CLOWNS, All of this shit you post is yesterdays news, so please find something more interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Cara, I apologize to you for encouraging this goof known as "anonymous."

    ReplyDelete
  7. LOL MJ, no worries, anonymous is Olerockytoptennesee, and it doesn't take much. I get into regular throwdowns with the guy. Luckily he can't argue his way out of a wet paper bag, but then the fight is always unfair.

    Glad to have someone else in the fray too...;-)
    Cara

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks, Cara, it's good to know that.

    If you get a chance to listen to the Randi Rhodes radio segment (linked above) and watch the "What's the Truth? video, I would love to hear your opinion. But it's not a requirement, and certainly no hurry. It's just a thought. ;-)

    I would like to tell you about a blog by a woman in a neighboring state to yours who seems to share many beliefs in common with us. She is also somewhat new to the blogging world but has become somewhat better known than we are because she called in to the Mike Malloy Show on Air America radio recently, and he encouraged her to give her blog address (her husband is also serving in Iraq). If I told you her address, though, I would almost certainly unleash "Rocky" on her too, and we cannot have that, can we? Ha??

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous8:24 PM

    Thanks MJW for the information you provided, if this woman has a blog on blogspot you have given me all of the info I need to do my search and locate.

    Man I love you No Talent Ass Clowns remember my generation gave you guys this toy called a Computer.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous8:54 PM

    http://www.debunking911.com/

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey now, don't go throwing around "No Talent Ass Clown," that phrase is strictly reserved for Michael Bolton.

    ReplyDelete